0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹Çü ȯÀںзùü°èÀÇ °³Á¤¿¬±¸

Study for Revision of the Korean Patient Classification System

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2018³â 24±Ç 1È£ p.113 ~ 126
KMID : 1004620180240010113
¼Û°æÀÚ ( Song Kyung-Ja ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø

ÃÖ¿ÏÈñ ( Choi Wan-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø
Á¶¼ºÇö ( Cho Sung-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
À¯¹Ì ( Yu Mi ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Ú¹Ì¹Ì ( Park Mi-Mi ) - ¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³º´¿ø
ÀÌÁß¿± ( Lee Joong-Yub ) - ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to revise the KPCS-1 and to standardize the three patient classification systems for general ward, ICU and NICU. The actual utilization of the KPCS-1 score and each nursing activity was evaluated and the relationships between KPCS-1 score and nursing related variables were reviewed.

Methods: The 47,711 KPCS-1 scores of 6,931 patients who discharged from 1st to 30th April 2017 were analyzed and the statistical significance between KPCS-1 score and nursing related variables was reviewed by Generalized Estimating Equation. The revision of the KPCS-1 was carried out by Partial Least Square model. The 3 patient classification systems (KPCS-1,KPCSC and KPCSN) were standardized by professional reviews.

Results: KPCS-1 was a valid instrument to express nursing condition adequately and was revised as a new version which has 34 nursing activity items. The names and terminologies of pre-existing 3 patient classification systems developed by KHNA were standardized as KPCS-GW, KPCS-ICU, KPCS-NICU.

Conclusion: KPCS-1 was a valid instrument to represent diverse nursing conditions precisely and was revised as a 34-item KPCS-GW. The terminologies of the other patient classification systems by KHNA were standardized as KPCS-ICU and KPCS-NICU.
KeyWords
ȯÀÚ, ºÐ·ù, °£È£, ¾÷¹«ºÎ´ã
Patient, Classification, Nursing, Workload
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)